Muslim Maldivians beware. This the dangerous propaganda this man is spreading.
Watch video and decide for your self . Do you really want your children to be taught these kinds of things?
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Do you think Zakir Naik will create more intolerance in Maldives?
After watching his videos, we think that Zakir Naik will turn Maldivian against Maldivian, father and mothers and sons and daughters against each other. He preaches intolerance.
His ideas are not good for the future of our beloved nation.
Please look this one video. There is many online.
His ideas are not good for the future of our beloved nation.
Please look this one video. There is many online.
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Information limiting culture is not good for future
Some practices of Muslim Maldivians are sadly very damaging to themselves, their children and society. Muslim Maldivians take censorship very seriously and there are many things banned for Muslim Maldivians by their Scholars.
Take example this conversation on Facebook:Hathim Ah Long Ali Ok, serious question is serious ... How strict is Maldivian law towards the showing of ''other faiths'' on Cable TV. I was watching Nat Geo, and they were showing a really interesting program about Jesus Christ, Bethlehem and the Palestine-Israel Conflict all rolled into one ''Inside Bethlehem'' I believe... So 10 minu...tes in as I was getting more engrossed in it .... The program suddenly cuts to black and the channel is completely cut leaving an empty screen... Was it pure coincidence or are they not allowed to show such stuff on Cable? - I did some surfing and even Animal Planet was cut off .... So just bad timing perhaps?
When Maldivians are deprived of knowledge that is generally available around the world the population is more ignorant of the world . By censoring information Muslim Maldivians are pushing themselves and their families and the whole nation into further ignorance.
Soon all the people may be Islamic Scholars who know all the good Muslim books and the correct Path to Heaven of Islam.
But many educated Muslim Maldivians and Non Muslim Maldivians who do not like such restrictions to information will leave the country.
Then WHO will operate computers, windmills, solar panels, airplanes etc?
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
The good moral of the Muslim Maldivian
There are many Muslim Maldivians.
There are Sunnis and Sufis. There are Salafis and Wahhabees and different beliefs and different sects. Many Muslim Maldivians perform a few religious obligations perfunctorily while others are zealous in dedication to prayers. Some never set a foot inside a mosque unless relative or friend or enemy is dead. Some never bow head towards Mecca but if you ask they say they are Muslims. Some people recite Gur'aan and Solavaai fulu daily. Some Muslim Maldivians sometimes change some of their religious belief. Some people have travelled dozens of times to the Holy Cities of Mecca and Medina.
Muslim Maldivians do not have any ill will or hatred for people of other religious beliefs. Many Muslim Maldivians life outside Maldives among Christians, Hindus, Buddhists etc. Many Muslim Maldivians send their sons and daughters to live and study with people of other religions in countries where there are other religions. Many Muslims have friends who are Christians.
The good moral of the Muslim Maldivian is defend and protect the minority Non Muslim Maldivians from any discrimination or persecution because of their religious belief.
There are Sunnis and Sufis. There are Salafis and Wahhabees and different beliefs and different sects. Many Muslim Maldivians perform a few religious obligations perfunctorily while others are zealous in dedication to prayers. Some never set a foot inside a mosque unless relative or friend or enemy is dead. Some never bow head towards Mecca but if you ask they say they are Muslims. Some people recite Gur'aan and Solavaai fulu daily. Some Muslim Maldivians sometimes change some of their religious belief. Some people have travelled dozens of times to the Holy Cities of Mecca and Medina.
Muslim Maldivians do not have any ill will or hatred for people of other religious beliefs. Many Muslim Maldivians life outside Maldives among Christians, Hindus, Buddhists etc. Many Muslim Maldivians send their sons and daughters to live and study with people of other religions in countries where there are other religions. Many Muslims have friends who are Christians.
The good moral of the Muslim Maldivian is defend and protect the minority Non Muslim Maldivians from any discrimination or persecution because of their religious belief.
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Who are the Non Muslim Maldivians?
They are just like the other Maldivian. There is no physical difference. One difference is what they believe about this universe and creation.
Muslim Maldivian believe that everything was created by a being they call Allah and so on...
There is many kind of beliefs among Non Muslims. Some Non Muslims are Hindhus. Others are Buddhists. There is atheists. There are Christians and satanist and etc.
The other difference is Non Muslim Maldivians do get Human Rights in their own country.
Except for this different belief they are the same as Muslim Maldivians.
There is no physical difference. They are your sons and your daughters. Your mothers and fathers. Your brothers and sisters.
Muslim Maldivian believe that everything was created by a being they call Allah and so on...
There is many kind of beliefs among Non Muslims. Some Non Muslims are Hindhus. Others are Buddhists. There is atheists. There are Christians and satanist and etc.
The other difference is Non Muslim Maldivians do get Human Rights in their own country.
Except for this different belief they are the same as Muslim Maldivians.
There is no physical difference. They are your sons and your daughters. Your mothers and fathers. Your brothers and sisters.
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Join Non Muslim Maldivians & Friends with Instant Messaging & Video Chat
By popular demand the Paltalk Chat Room with Instant Messaging & Video Chat for Non Muslim Maldivians and Friends will be opened again.
To join Non Muslim Maldivians & Friends download Paltalk free. Room is in Other section under Asia, Pacific, Oceania.
Click here to download Paltalk and join Non Muslim Maldivians & Friends
Please not that at times the room may be closed due to unforeseen circumstances
To join Non Muslim Maldivians & Friends download Paltalk free. Room is in Other section under Asia, Pacific, Oceania.
Click here to download Paltalk and join Non Muslim Maldivians & Friends
Please not that at times the room may be closed due to unforeseen circumstances
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Islamic Law Strangles Free Speech
COPENHAGEN, Denmark - I am being patted down by a female Danish security officer in the basement of the parliament building in Copenhagen and I have a thought. I have just triggered the metal detector - my heels, I'm sure - en route upstairs to the Landstingssalen, formerly the parliament's upper house. There, I am scheduled to deliver a speech at the invitation of the Danish Free Press Society, or Trykkefrihedsselskabet. (Say that three times fast - or slow.)
Indeed, I am holding the text of my 20-minute address inside a folder in one of my hands, now rigidly outstretched as I am being searched. The speech is called ``The Impact of Islam on Free Speech in the U.S.,'' but as I am checked for bombs and knives and whatnot, my thought is of the impact of Islam on free society everywhere.
Such a thought surely tops the heights of ``political incorrectness,'' I know. But what should I do - not express it? Not think it? Not even notice that Western civilization, in skewing to accommodate the jihad threat of Islam within, has already traded away too much precious freedom?
As the security officer continues patting me down, I follow this forbidden train of thought to the realization that it is only due to the incursions of Islam into the West - Islam with its death penalty for criticism of Islam - that I am now standing here under guard. Here we are (for there is a long line behind me by now), participants in a conference to consider Islam's censoring impact on free speech, and Danish security is doing its best to prevent Islam from censoring the speech of anyone here permanently. This strikes me as an exceedingly hard way to prove a point.
Not that there are many people likely to try outside the elegant, security-ringed conference room upstairs. In PC lingo, security in the basement is looking for ``terrorists'' or ``extremists'' - those postmodern designations for perpetrators of Islamic jihad that, presto, turn everything Islamic into something generic. Still, with Islam comes jihad, and with jihad comes Islamic law (Sharia), no matter what ``experts'' tell you. And because Islam is a growing presence in the West, Western countries must now and presumably forever expend vast sums of money and manpower to manage - not defeat, just manage - the jihad that can break out in acts large and small at any time. Increasingly, this also means deferring to Sharia. Finally, my pre-conference frisk is over. Hallelujah, I am no threat to society and allowed to pass. I go on to meet for the first time the great author Wafa Sultan, and meet again the great Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders, the two most illustrious speakers on the conference roster.
Both Sultan and Wilders, of course, live under unrelenting, permanent and Islamic threat of death for their critiques of Islam, in a very real way suffering every day for defying Sharia's prohibition against criticizing Islam. But does the outrageousness of their plight resonate with their fellow citizens? I don't think so. I think we've all grown much too used to it, and dully complacent.
But imagine if I had written, circa 1970, that for his critique of communism, Ronald Reagan lived under unrelenting, permanent and communist threat of death in his beloved California, that he couldn't travel the streets of Los Angeles without a massive security retinue, that he could no longer even sleep in his own home. Wouldn't Americans have become rightly agitated over the communist enemy within?
I think the answer would have been yes, but the point is, no such mortal homeland danger existed at that time for those who spoke against the leading threat to Western-style liberty. Today, a mortal homeland danger does exist. I won't tell you what it was like to slip in and out of the Wilders security bubble during the course of his stay in Copenhagen, but suffice it to say, it is both a veritable shame and an outrage that his life depends on that bubble, and that for speaking his mind in defense of Western-style liberty he has lost his own freedom.
The same goes for Wafa Sultan, who, for attacking the repressiveness of Islamic law (under which she existed for 30 years in Syria), also lives privately a similarly wary, hunted life that necessitates protective security measures.
Remember, this is happening in the ``Free World.'' Whether in Denmark, Holland or the United States, the heavy hand of Islamic law is pressing in on its leading critics, squeezing the freedom out of their existence. It is time to say enough - literally enough, for example, and stop Sharia by stopping Islamic immigration - and throw off the rising chokehold of jihad-advanced Sharia. I guarantee it will take a lot more effort than just patting down the occasional free speechnik, but I also guarantee that for the sake of free speech it is worth it.
By Diana West
Indeed, I am holding the text of my 20-minute address inside a folder in one of my hands, now rigidly outstretched as I am being searched. The speech is called ``The Impact of Islam on Free Speech in the U.S.,'' but as I am checked for bombs and knives and whatnot, my thought is of the impact of Islam on free society everywhere.
Such a thought surely tops the heights of ``political incorrectness,'' I know. But what should I do - not express it? Not think it? Not even notice that Western civilization, in skewing to accommodate the jihad threat of Islam within, has already traded away too much precious freedom?
As the security officer continues patting me down, I follow this forbidden train of thought to the realization that it is only due to the incursions of Islam into the West - Islam with its death penalty for criticism of Islam - that I am now standing here under guard. Here we are (for there is a long line behind me by now), participants in a conference to consider Islam's censoring impact on free speech, and Danish security is doing its best to prevent Islam from censoring the speech of anyone here permanently. This strikes me as an exceedingly hard way to prove a point.
Not that there are many people likely to try outside the elegant, security-ringed conference room upstairs. In PC lingo, security in the basement is looking for ``terrorists'' or ``extremists'' - those postmodern designations for perpetrators of Islamic jihad that, presto, turn everything Islamic into something generic. Still, with Islam comes jihad, and with jihad comes Islamic law (Sharia), no matter what ``experts'' tell you. And because Islam is a growing presence in the West, Western countries must now and presumably forever expend vast sums of money and manpower to manage - not defeat, just manage - the jihad that can break out in acts large and small at any time. Increasingly, this also means deferring to Sharia. Finally, my pre-conference frisk is over. Hallelujah, I am no threat to society and allowed to pass. I go on to meet for the first time the great author Wafa Sultan, and meet again the great Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders, the two most illustrious speakers on the conference roster.
Both Sultan and Wilders, of course, live under unrelenting, permanent and Islamic threat of death for their critiques of Islam, in a very real way suffering every day for defying Sharia's prohibition against criticizing Islam. But does the outrageousness of their plight resonate with their fellow citizens? I don't think so. I think we've all grown much too used to it, and dully complacent.
But imagine if I had written, circa 1970, that for his critique of communism, Ronald Reagan lived under unrelenting, permanent and communist threat of death in his beloved California, that he couldn't travel the streets of Los Angeles without a massive security retinue, that he could no longer even sleep in his own home. Wouldn't Americans have become rightly agitated over the communist enemy within?
I think the answer would have been yes, but the point is, no such mortal homeland danger existed at that time for those who spoke against the leading threat to Western-style liberty. Today, a mortal homeland danger does exist. I won't tell you what it was like to slip in and out of the Wilders security bubble during the course of his stay in Copenhagen, but suffice it to say, it is both a veritable shame and an outrage that his life depends on that bubble, and that for speaking his mind in defense of Western-style liberty he has lost his own freedom.
The same goes for Wafa Sultan, who, for attacking the repressiveness of Islamic law (under which she existed for 30 years in Syria), also lives privately a similarly wary, hunted life that necessitates protective security measures.
Remember, this is happening in the ``Free World.'' Whether in Denmark, Holland or the United States, the heavy hand of Islamic law is pressing in on its leading critics, squeezing the freedom out of their existence. It is time to say enough - literally enough, for example, and stop Sharia by stopping Islamic immigration - and throw off the rising chokehold of jihad-advanced Sharia. I guarantee it will take a lot more effort than just patting down the occasional free speechnik, but I also guarantee that for the sake of free speech it is worth it.
By Diana West
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
