Recently I was at a community function and seated next to a local beggar who usually hangs around the neighborhood with his hand out always asking for spare change. I can't say the food was particularly good but most people took it in stride, he however lashed out and began shouting that the soda was poison, the food was disgusting and the particular food that he wanted and had been promised wasn't available. Eventually after eating some more, he left angrily.
On a scale of civilizations, Islam is the beggar at the feast. The modern world has birthed an incredible wealth of technologies and products, economic prosperity, human rights and freedoms. Knowledge and communication have been expanded as never before and mankind has gone from the depths of the ocean to set foot on the surface of the moon and within a decade Mars.
Liberal dogma has it that this 'feast' is one that excludes the developing nations and takes place at their expense, but it is not. Israel and Singapore are radically different countries but they are examples of how even small countries can harness technological and commercial energies to become players in the arena. Japan rebuilt itself after the devastation of WW2, two atomic bombs and American occupation to become a technological and economic superpower. Even in the 50's when Israel was less than a decade old and poor, an Israeli university was already running a supercomputer.
Anyone can join the feast, any country genuinely committed to
1. Educating its citizens
2. Progress
(Note that I didn't even include freedom on the list, because Singapore manages to do without it. But even these two terms scare Arab Muslim countries badly enough because they make it difficult to control the population.)
When the 21st century dawned, the Arab Muslim world's response to it in 2001 was the most brutal terrorist attack on a major civilian target in history. A target specifically associated with commerce and prosperity. Since then Islam has brought a new wave of terrorism across the world from Bali to Istanbul to London to Madrid. The bloody tide is supposed to usher in a Caliphate but all it is ushering in is the growing awareness by millions of Americans and Europeans that Islam is incompatible with a 21st century civilization.
Why does the beggar get angry at the feast? It isn't because he doesn't have enough, it's because he chooses not to have enough. There are plenty of people who are deprived, but the professional beggar is an entirely separate category, he transforms his inadequacy into his identity. This is the nature of Islam.
The new Islamic identity celebrates the inadequacies of the Muslim world as virtues. Muslim men can't look at women dressed normally without wanting to rape them, this their Imams transform into a virtue and a reflection of the "immoral women". Muslims can't get along with Non-Muslims, this the Imams claims is proof that Muslims are oppressed. Muslims display intolerance for the everyday practices of the people they live among, including their wine and their pork products, their Imams claim this represents a lack of respect for Muslims rather than the other way around.
Arab Muslim tyrannies can't participate in the 21st century and rather than changing their countries, they funnel dissatisfaction into terrorism against America and Israel and blame the whole thing on "outside interference". The beggar at the feast strikes again.
Islam has made such a natural ally for the left because both reject the idea of progress as immoral. The left has chosen to embrace global warming's call for "Back to the Caves" and the Arab Muslim world is already living there. Both piggyback on 21st century technologies like the internet while furiously employing it to denounce technology and the civilization that generates it. If the left represents the disgruntled epicurean and the Islamic hordes are the barbarians at the gate, their commonality is based on a need to overturn the social, moral and political order of the nation.
The endless Western aid that pours into the Muslim world represents welfare. The Marshall Plan funded the ability of devastated nations to get back on their feet (perhaps excessively so) while the US and the UN's programs continue to pour money in to nations that cannot productively use it and that choose to remain backward. No matter what you give the beggar at the feast, he will stay angry because anger is his identity. It is in the end humiliating to be a beggar, even if one chooses it, and humiliation spawns anger. And that anger burns the keenest and must be directed outward when that humiliation is the product of your own choices.
Islam has chosen to be the beggar of the new millennium and engaged in an orgy of violence to overturn civilization and become its master, building a caliphate of ignorance on the ruins of the civilized world.
With thanks to Sultan Knish
Monday, December 31, 2007
Thursday, December 20, 2007
Warning - Vigilance Required
We have recently had an attack. It is quite possible that those kind of elements may be planning an attack on a tourist resort during Christmas. It is a scary thought. But the warnings are out there. The possibility of a holiday strike is there, and we should maintain general vigilance at all times.
There are warnings from Islamic clerics: do not participate in the infidels' festivities, do not wish them holiday greetings, do not endorse or participate in any manner what Muslim hardliners see as celebrations of infidelity and the rejection of Allah. This way of thinking is being reemphasized among Salafist communities and it instills a contempt and hatred for non-Muslims particularly on the occasions of their holidays and could become the rationalization for an attack during the Christmas holidays.
The Jihadists have an eye for the grand symbol, and this could conceivably take the form of a strike around Christmas.
Thursday, November 22, 2007
Constitution or Shariah Law?
One of the important developments in our constitutional structure was the establishment of the Special Majlis; as a response to the demand for a strengthening of the checks and balances in the system of state administration and constitutional reform.
The improvement in the constitutional reform situation and the amendment has been very slow and its has been dragging for the last 5 years for petty political reasons by the two main political parties, the main opposition party Maldives Democratic Party MDP and the ruling party Dhivehi Rayithunge Party DRP. Recently, the special Majlis is forced to stay put on disagreements over whether to include Islamic Shariah law in the constitution. Both, main opposition part MDP and the government are equally uneasy of religious dissent apparently on the rise in the Maldives and fearful of the growing Islamic extremism in The Maldives. In this state of affairs both opposition and the government is reluctant to enter a new stage of constitutional reform and practice in regard to fight for the basic right of freedom of religion.
This basic right is clearly stated in international human rights instruments, particularly Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and Article 18 of the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
"Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance". UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS Adopted by UN General Assembly Resolution 217A (III) of 10 December 1948.
Until today, the main problems regarding the protection of freedom of religion have never entered the arena of Special Majlis and in constitutional reform. A constitution as the supreme law of the land sets out the basic structure of the governmental system in every nation. The constitution of every country, however, has different characteristics that can influence the form of the state. As regards the freedom of religion, we often hear about the different concepts of a religious state, secular state and other types of state.
The Indian Constitution, which added the word “secular”, shows that India is a secular state that places special emphasis on the values of freedom of religion and tolerance. The First Amendment to the American Constitution guarantees freedom of religion for each of its citizen.
In relationship between constitutions and freedom of religion, the countries that have majority Muslim populations are divided into four categories.
First, countries that openly declare themselves to be Islamic states.
Second, countries that have officially adopted Islam as the official religion of the state.
Third, countries that declare themselves to be secular states.
Fourth, countries that make no such declarations in their constitutions.
If Maldives belongs to the first category, then the question arises as to what is the real concept of the state that was created by our founding fathers? The question is when did Maldives became an Islamic state and How? What was the religion of our fore fathers? Originally Maldivians followed the Dravidian Mother-Goddess worship and its rituals. The country underwent a conversion to Buddhism about 2,000 years ago which brought about an unprecedented flourishing of the Maldivian culture, including the language which by then developed its own script. Almost all significant Maldivian archaeological remains and cultural accomplishments are from that period. But about 800 years ago the country was converted to the Muslim religion.
A confessional state can only be based on a particular religion, while a secular state prevents religion from interfering with state affairs. Moreover, Can Maldives be or become a nation through its constitutional reform? A religious state that protects and facilitates the development of all religions adhered to by the people without any differences in treatment arising from the number of a religion’s adherent?
In this context, it is essential that the State has a constitutional obligation to protect the freedom of religion of each of its citizens, when the Constitution is held in one of our hands, the holy book must be held in the other hand. This means that these two things have to work in harmony and that one cannot contradict the other.
Maldives is one of the countries that lack experience as regards the protection of freedom of religion through the constitutional reform mechanism. In fact, this mechanism is an important tool in other countries when the freedom of religion finds itself under attack by state action.
Unfortunately, constitutional reform in Maldives is confined to the review of laws. This means that the Maldivian constitutional system and its practice need to be developed more seriously. Due to the lack of constitutional protection mechanisms, there are currently huge obstacles in the way of citizens seeking to affirm their basic rights to freedom of religion.
The Maldives is going through a period in history which the nation has never seen before. Through the constitutional reform Shariah Law is included or not. In a modern and in a liberal democracy the constitution and its government function on basic human right in which includes.
1. A secular state.
2. A just and trustworthy government.
3. A free and independent people.
4. A vigorous pursuit and mastery of knowledge.
5. A balanced and comprehensive economic development.
6. A good quality of life for the people.
7. Protection of the rights of minority groups, religion and women and children.
8. Cultural and moral integrity.
9. Safeguarding the environment.
10. Strong defense capabilities
Out of the above ten most basic human rights. A free and independent people are one of the main principles of Islam and in a constitution. In a Shariah law or in a constitution or both combined, the most important is to create free and independent people. Among the characteristics of these people is that they are creative and innovative. Independent people are able to produce dynamic and positive new ideas which are beneficial for the promotion of individuals, families, society and country. Independent people are not a society which exempted from the rules law and ethics. It must be used as a base to develop a strong society and country. An independent and free people must be able to select and choose for themselves, besides adopt an open attitude towards external cultures and traditions which do not go against values and ethics and that contribute towards the development of the nation. It is not merely slogans and declarations but requires sacrifices and serious efforts which contribute towards the development of the country.
Up to you the people of The Maldives and to The Special Majlis.
IF Shariah Law is to be included in the constitution, what is the reason to make or amend the constitution at all. when rule of law and regulation is written in Allah’s words in Holy Quran?
The improvement in the constitutional reform situation and the amendment has been very slow and its has been dragging for the last 5 years for petty political reasons by the two main political parties, the main opposition party Maldives Democratic Party MDP and the ruling party Dhivehi Rayithunge Party DRP. Recently, the special Majlis is forced to stay put on disagreements over whether to include Islamic Shariah law in the constitution. Both, main opposition part MDP and the government are equally uneasy of religious dissent apparently on the rise in the Maldives and fearful of the growing Islamic extremism in The Maldives. In this state of affairs both opposition and the government is reluctant to enter a new stage of constitutional reform and practice in regard to fight for the basic right of freedom of religion.
This basic right is clearly stated in international human rights instruments, particularly Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and Article 18 of the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
"Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance". UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS Adopted by UN General Assembly Resolution 217A (III) of 10 December 1948.
Until today, the main problems regarding the protection of freedom of religion have never entered the arena of Special Majlis and in constitutional reform. A constitution as the supreme law of the land sets out the basic structure of the governmental system in every nation. The constitution of every country, however, has different characteristics that can influence the form of the state. As regards the freedom of religion, we often hear about the different concepts of a religious state, secular state and other types of state.
The Indian Constitution, which added the word “secular”, shows that India is a secular state that places special emphasis on the values of freedom of religion and tolerance. The First Amendment to the American Constitution guarantees freedom of religion for each of its citizen.
In relationship between constitutions and freedom of religion, the countries that have majority Muslim populations are divided into four categories.
First, countries that openly declare themselves to be Islamic states.
Second, countries that have officially adopted Islam as the official religion of the state.
Third, countries that declare themselves to be secular states.
Fourth, countries that make no such declarations in their constitutions.
If Maldives belongs to the first category, then the question arises as to what is the real concept of the state that was created by our founding fathers? The question is when did Maldives became an Islamic state and How? What was the religion of our fore fathers? Originally Maldivians followed the Dravidian Mother-Goddess worship and its rituals. The country underwent a conversion to Buddhism about 2,000 years ago which brought about an unprecedented flourishing of the Maldivian culture, including the language which by then developed its own script. Almost all significant Maldivian archaeological remains and cultural accomplishments are from that period. But about 800 years ago the country was converted to the Muslim religion.
A confessional state can only be based on a particular religion, while a secular state prevents religion from interfering with state affairs. Moreover, Can Maldives be or become a nation through its constitutional reform? A religious state that protects and facilitates the development of all religions adhered to by the people without any differences in treatment arising from the number of a religion’s adherent?
In this context, it is essential that the State has a constitutional obligation to protect the freedom of religion of each of its citizens, when the Constitution is held in one of our hands, the holy book must be held in the other hand. This means that these two things have to work in harmony and that one cannot contradict the other.
Maldives is one of the countries that lack experience as regards the protection of freedom of religion through the constitutional reform mechanism. In fact, this mechanism is an important tool in other countries when the freedom of religion finds itself under attack by state action.
Unfortunately, constitutional reform in Maldives is confined to the review of laws. This means that the Maldivian constitutional system and its practice need to be developed more seriously. Due to the lack of constitutional protection mechanisms, there are currently huge obstacles in the way of citizens seeking to affirm their basic rights to freedom of religion.
The Maldives is going through a period in history which the nation has never seen before. Through the constitutional reform Shariah Law is included or not. In a modern and in a liberal democracy the constitution and its government function on basic human right in which includes.
1. A secular state.
2. A just and trustworthy government.
3. A free and independent people.
4. A vigorous pursuit and mastery of knowledge.
5. A balanced and comprehensive economic development.
6. A good quality of life for the people.
7. Protection of the rights of minority groups, religion and women and children.
8. Cultural and moral integrity.
9. Safeguarding the environment.
10. Strong defense capabilities
Out of the above ten most basic human rights. A free and independent people are one of the main principles of Islam and in a constitution. In a Shariah law or in a constitution or both combined, the most important is to create free and independent people. Among the characteristics of these people is that they are creative and innovative. Independent people are able to produce dynamic and positive new ideas which are beneficial for the promotion of individuals, families, society and country. Independent people are not a society which exempted from the rules law and ethics. It must be used as a base to develop a strong society and country. An independent and free people must be able to select and choose for themselves, besides adopt an open attitude towards external cultures and traditions which do not go against values and ethics and that contribute towards the development of the nation. It is not merely slogans and declarations but requires sacrifices and serious efforts which contribute towards the development of the country.
Up to you the people of The Maldives and to The Special Majlis.
IF Shariah Law is to be included in the constitution, what is the reason to make or amend the constitution at all. when rule of law and regulation is written in Allah’s words in Holy Quran?
Islam and the nation-state
Throughout the world, one of the most prevalent causes of war, terrorism and political instability is the ongoing weakening of the nation-state system. There are several reasons that the nation-state as a political unit of sovereignty is under threat. One of the most basic causes of this continuous erosion of national power throughout the world is the transformation of minority-dominated enclaves within nation-states into ungovernable areas where state power is either not applied or applied in a haphazard and generally unconstructive manner.
While domestic strife between majority and minority populations has been an enduring feature of democratic and indeed all societies throughout history, the current turbulence constitutes a unique challenge to the nation-state system. This is because much of the internal strife between minority and majority populations within states today is financed and often directed from outside the country.
Traditionally, minorities used various local means to engage the majority population in a bid to influence the political direction or cultural norms of the nation state. The classic examples of this traditional minority-majority engagement are the black civil rights movement in the US in the 1960s and the labor movements in the West throughout the 20th century. By and large, these movements were domestic protests informed by national sensibilities even when they enjoyed the support of foreign governments.
Today while similar movements continue to flourish, they are now being superseded by a new type of minority challenge to national majorities.
This challenge is not primarily the result of domestic injustice but the consequence of foreign agitation. The roots of these minority challenges are found outside the borders of the targeted states. And their goals are not limited to a call for the reform of national institutions and politics. Rather they set their sights on weakening national institutions and eroding national sovereignty.
MUSLIM MINORITIES throughout the world are being financed and ideologically trained in Saudi and UAE funded mosques and Islamic centers. These minorities act in strikingly similar manners in the countries where they are situated throughout the world. On the one hand, their local political leaders demand extraordinary communal rights, rights accorded neither to the national majority nor to other minority populations. On the other hand, Muslim neighborhoods, particularly in Europe, but also in Israel, the Philippines and Australia, are rendered increasingly ungovernable as arms of the state like the police and tax authorities come under attack when they attempt to assert state power in these Muslim communities.
To continue reading this article click here
Sunday, October 7, 2007
Fighting and Killing is an Islamic Principle.
The God of Islam in The KURAN (Quran) says:
Then Fight and slay the Pagans (every non-muslims) * wherever ye find them, and Seize them (altawba 9:5)
Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. (altawba 9: 29)
Allah told them to kill non Muslims any where and they will get many Virgins Girls (from 41 to more than 12 500 Virgins Girls for each Muslim man ) in their Paradise as a Reward for obeying Allah and killing the non Muslims people in there Holy War: i.e. THE JIHAD
Look to some Kuran Teachings that Teach Musilms
To Fight and Slay the Non-Muslims
The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians). (alfatiha 1:7)
Fight them, and Allah will punish them by your hands, cover them with shame, help you (to victory) over them, heal the breasts of Believers, (altawba 9: 14)
And yet another translation
Fight against them so that Allâh will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people, (9:14)
But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans * wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); (altawba 9:19)
And yet another translation
Then when the Sacred Months have passed, then kill the Mushrikûn wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every ambush. But if they repent and perform As-Salât (Iqâmat-as-Salât), and give Zakât, then leave their way free. Verily, Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. (see V.2:105) (altawba 9:19)
(V.2:105) Neither those who disbelieve among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) nor Al-Mushrikûn (the disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh, idolaters, polytheists, pagans, Christians how worship Jesus as God, etc.) like that there should be sent down unto you any good from your Lord. But Allâh chooses for His Mercy whom He wills. And Allâh is the Owner of Great Bounty. (albaqara 2:105)
And in the following verses you will see that Muhamad identified Christians as Disbelievers and Mushrikûn because he did not understand the Christian faith neither the Trinity - the Godhead in the Bible - nor the personality of Jesus Christ as the Eternal Son of God. Therefore, Muhamad considered Christians as Mushrikûn.
According to him, disbelievers are those who say:
"Allâh is the third of the three (in a Trinity)." But there is no ilâh (god) (none who has the right to be worshipped) but One Ilâh (God -Allâh). And if they cease not from what tthey say, verily, a painful torment will befall the disbelievers among them. (almaida 5:73)
They indeed have disbelieved who say: Lo! Allah (God) is the Messiah (Jesus Christ ) , son of Mary (almaida 5:17)
Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. (altawba 9: 29)
The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;(almaida 5:33)
Fighting is prescribed upon you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not. (albaqara 2:216)
O Prophet! rouse the Believers to the fight. If there are twenty amongst you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred: if a hundred, they will vanquish a thousand of the Unbelievers: for these are a people without understanding. (alanfal 8:65)
Based on the previous verses, we conclude that Islam considers Christians as Pagans, Disbelievers and Mushrikûn, because they:
1- Believe not in Allâh of the KURAN, nor forbid what has been forbidden by Allâh of the KURAN and his Messenger.
2 - Do not accept Muhamad as Prophet and Messenger from the True Allâh (LORD God )
3 - Acknowledge not the religion of Islam as it is From God.
4 - Worship Jesus Christ as the Eternal Word of God.
5 - Believe that the true Allâh is the One True God In His Trinity as revealed in the Holy Bible.
Thus, Islam teaches that Christians and others should be Killed in the name of Allâh.
Islam pushes Christians to believe that Jesus Christ is not more than a prophet otherwise they will be KILLED by muslims.
Again
Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. (altawba 9: 29)
Then Fight and slay the Pagans (every non-muslims) * wherever ye find them, and Seize them (altawba 9:5)
Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. (altawba 9: 29)
Allah told them to kill non Muslims any where and they will get many Virgins Girls (from 41 to more than 12 500 Virgins Girls for each Muslim man ) in their Paradise as a Reward for obeying Allah and killing the non Muslims people in there Holy War: i.e. THE JIHAD
Look to some Kuran Teachings that Teach Musilms
To Fight and Slay the Non-Muslims
The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians). (alfatiha 1:7)
Fight them, and Allah will punish them by your hands, cover them with shame, help you (to victory) over them, heal the breasts of Believers, (altawba 9: 14)
And yet another translation
Fight against them so that Allâh will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people, (9:14)
But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans * wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); (altawba 9:19)
And yet another translation
Then when the Sacred Months have passed, then kill the Mushrikûn wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every ambush. But if they repent and perform As-Salât (Iqâmat-as-Salât), and give Zakât, then leave their way free. Verily, Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. (see V.2:105) (altawba 9:19)
(V.2:105) Neither those who disbelieve among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) nor Al-Mushrikûn (the disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh, idolaters, polytheists, pagans, Christians how worship Jesus as God, etc.) like that there should be sent down unto you any good from your Lord. But Allâh chooses for His Mercy whom He wills. And Allâh is the Owner of Great Bounty. (albaqara 2:105)
And in the following verses you will see that Muhamad identified Christians as Disbelievers and Mushrikûn because he did not understand the Christian faith neither the Trinity - the Godhead in the Bible - nor the personality of Jesus Christ as the Eternal Son of God. Therefore, Muhamad considered Christians as Mushrikûn.
According to him, disbelievers are those who say:
"Allâh is the third of the three (in a Trinity)." But there is no ilâh (god) (none who has the right to be worshipped) but One Ilâh (God -Allâh). And if they cease not from what tthey say, verily, a painful torment will befall the disbelievers among them. (almaida 5:73)
They indeed have disbelieved who say: Lo! Allah (God) is the Messiah (Jesus Christ ) , son of Mary (almaida 5:17)
Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. (altawba 9: 29)
The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;(almaida 5:33)
Fighting is prescribed upon you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not. (albaqara 2:216)
O Prophet! rouse the Believers to the fight. If there are twenty amongst you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred: if a hundred, they will vanquish a thousand of the Unbelievers: for these are a people without understanding. (alanfal 8:65)
Based on the previous verses, we conclude that Islam considers Christians as Pagans, Disbelievers and Mushrikûn, because they:
1- Believe not in Allâh of the KURAN, nor forbid what has been forbidden by Allâh of the KURAN and his Messenger.
2 - Do not accept Muhamad as Prophet and Messenger from the True Allâh (LORD God )
3 - Acknowledge not the religion of Islam as it is From God.
4 - Worship Jesus Christ as the Eternal Word of God.
5 - Believe that the true Allâh is the One True God In His Trinity as revealed in the Holy Bible.
Thus, Islam teaches that Christians and others should be Killed in the name of Allâh.
Islam pushes Christians to believe that Jesus Christ is not more than a prophet otherwise they will be KILLED by muslims.
Again
Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. (altawba 9: 29)
Friday, September 28, 2007
The conversion obsession
The Islamic world is truly obsessed with conversions. At least 7 Islamic countries apply the death penalty to those who convert from Islam: Sudan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Mauritania. But in other states, like Egypt, converts are condemned to prison, not as apostates but for contempt of Islam, as Hossam Bahgat, a member of the Egyptian Initiative for personal rights, explains.
According to government daily Al-Massa’, all imams are unanimous on the need to kill the apostate Hegazi. They say that sharia (not the Koran) must be enforced and it calls for the death penalty.The more moderate say: if the apostate hides his conversion, does not broadcast his decision, then it is not necessary to kill him; he can live. If he lets it be known, then he causes scandal (fitna) and must die.
from: Asia News
According to government daily Al-Massa’, all imams are unanimous on the need to kill the apostate Hegazi. They say that sharia (not the Koran) must be enforced and it calls for the death penalty.The more moderate say: if the apostate hides his conversion, does not broadcast his decision, then it is not necessary to kill him; he can live. If he lets it be known, then he causes scandal (fitna) and must die.
from: Asia News
Thursday, September 20, 2007
Islamic and Christian proselytising
Islam protects itself against conversions by putting apostates in prison or by killing them. But its obsession with conversion includes a series of privileges it claims for itself. So much so that in many Muslim countries, even those that are supposedly secular, the right to promote the Islamic faith is taken for granted and is not enshrined in law. Conversely, the right to promote any other religion is considered de facto and de jure unacceptable.
Islamic propaganda is part of the state’s mandate. In Egypt for example public institutions disseminate songs, prayers, movies and written material that praise Islam and denigrate Christianity. Inevitably this favours conversions to Islam. By contrast, Christian propaganda (tabshīr) is banned by law.
Recently in Algeria, a new law was approved that condemns anyone promoting the Christian faith and anyone who converts to Christianity. Of course, some might say that this kind of law is directed only at Protestant proselytising. True! But Muslims proselytise as well? Should the law not be the same for everyone?
Saudi Arabia is undoubtedly the country where double standards in matter of religion are the most glaring. One example: Saudi Arab Airlines’ website explicitly warns its passengers that Bibles, crucifixes, and any other non-Muslim religious symbol are prohibited on board. If any are found they are confiscated. Another example is when two pieces of wood happen to end up across one another. However inadvertently that may have come about, the resulting cross becomes ipso facto a religious symbol and police are known to have ordered people who happened to be nearby to step on them.
Anti-Christian propaganda is also found in how words are used. In Arabic Christians are called Massihi. In Arabia they are also called Salībi, crusaders, and Nasrami, Nazarenes. Interestingly, at the time of the Crusades Christians were by and large referred to as Faranj or Franks. But the most commonly used word today is kuffar, unbelievers who must be killed. For the past 30 or so years, its use has increasingly spread around the Muslim world.
By some estimates, the number of Christians who convert to Islam in Egypt is around 10,000, usually prompted by practical reasons like the need to divorce, or to marry a Muslim woman (or man), or to get a job. Rarely does faith come into the picture.
More recently there has been some talk about thousands of Muslim converts to Christianity. Protestant missionary centres, based in the United States (the Zwemer Institute* has been mentioned), are said to offer money, apartments, passports, etc in exchange for conversion to Christianity. Such charges have often found their way into the Muslim press in relation to the Hegazi affair.
In Arabic Tabshīr means ‘evangelisation’ and has taken on negative connotations. In Egypt and other countries anyone guilty of Tabshīr can end up in prison or pushed out of the country. On the other hand, dawah, which means a call to join Islam, has positive connotations and is seen as duty for every Muslim. In some Muslim countries dawah has its own ministry (or Ministry of Islamic Propaganda, a bit like the Vatican’s dicastery De propaganda fide).
When shall there be a spiritual Islam?
Leaving Islam is seen as a religious, social and political outrage.
From a religious point of view, converts abandon the true faith for a false one. Indeed, the Qur’an itself warns that “The only religion approved by GOD is ‘Submission’ (Qur’an 3:19),” and “Anyone who accepts other than Submission as his religion [. . .] will not be accepted from him, and in the Hereafter, he will be with the losers” (Qur’an 3:85).
From a social point of view, someone who converts to Christianity and encourages others to follow him or her becomes a cancer on society.
From a political point of view, anyone leaving Islam is a traitor, a spy against his own nation who deserves death, because Islam is always viewed as a community, the Ummah.
....
....
Read the full report here
Islamic propaganda is part of the state’s mandate. In Egypt for example public institutions disseminate songs, prayers, movies and written material that praise Islam and denigrate Christianity. Inevitably this favours conversions to Islam. By contrast, Christian propaganda (tabshīr) is banned by law.
Recently in Algeria, a new law was approved that condemns anyone promoting the Christian faith and anyone who converts to Christianity. Of course, some might say that this kind of law is directed only at Protestant proselytising. True! But Muslims proselytise as well? Should the law not be the same for everyone?
Saudi Arabia is undoubtedly the country where double standards in matter of religion are the most glaring. One example: Saudi Arab Airlines’ website explicitly warns its passengers that Bibles, crucifixes, and any other non-Muslim religious symbol are prohibited on board. If any are found they are confiscated. Another example is when two pieces of wood happen to end up across one another. However inadvertently that may have come about, the resulting cross becomes ipso facto a religious symbol and police are known to have ordered people who happened to be nearby to step on them.
Anti-Christian propaganda is also found in how words are used. In Arabic Christians are called Massihi. In Arabia they are also called Salībi, crusaders, and Nasrami, Nazarenes. Interestingly, at the time of the Crusades Christians were by and large referred to as Faranj or Franks. But the most commonly used word today is kuffar, unbelievers who must be killed. For the past 30 or so years, its use has increasingly spread around the Muslim world.
By some estimates, the number of Christians who convert to Islam in Egypt is around 10,000, usually prompted by practical reasons like the need to divorce, or to marry a Muslim woman (or man), or to get a job. Rarely does faith come into the picture.
More recently there has been some talk about thousands of Muslim converts to Christianity. Protestant missionary centres, based in the United States (the Zwemer Institute* has been mentioned), are said to offer money, apartments, passports, etc in exchange for conversion to Christianity. Such charges have often found their way into the Muslim press in relation to the Hegazi affair.
In Arabic Tabshīr means ‘evangelisation’ and has taken on negative connotations. In Egypt and other countries anyone guilty of Tabshīr can end up in prison or pushed out of the country. On the other hand, dawah, which means a call to join Islam, has positive connotations and is seen as duty for every Muslim. In some Muslim countries dawah has its own ministry (or Ministry of Islamic Propaganda, a bit like the Vatican’s dicastery De propaganda fide).
When shall there be a spiritual Islam?
Leaving Islam is seen as a religious, social and political outrage.
From a religious point of view, converts abandon the true faith for a false one. Indeed, the Qur’an itself warns that “The only religion approved by GOD is ‘Submission’ (Qur’an 3:19),” and “Anyone who accepts other than Submission as his religion [. . .] will not be accepted from him, and in the Hereafter, he will be with the losers” (Qur’an 3:85).
From a social point of view, someone who converts to Christianity and encourages others to follow him or her becomes a cancer on society.
From a political point of view, anyone leaving Islam is a traitor, a spy against his own nation who deserves death, because Islam is always viewed as a community, the Ummah.
....
....
Read the full report here
Saturday, September 15, 2007
Intolerance Warning
The Muslim holy month of Ramadan has begun. In addition to fasting from dawn to dusk, Muslims are obligated to read the entire Koran during this month. Non-Muslims should be aware of some of the things their Muslim neighbors will be reading in the Koran:
The unbelievers among the people of the book and the pagans shall burn forever in the fire of Hell. They are the vilest of all creatures. (98.6).
Surely the vilest of animals in Allah's sight are those who disbelieve. (8.55)
The unbelievers are your inveterate enemy. (4:101)
Mohammed is God's apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another. (48:29).
It is unlawful for a believer to kill another believer, accidents excepted. (4:92)
Believers, take neither the Jews nor the Christians for your friends. (5:51)
Make war on them [non-Muslims] until idolatry shall cease and God's religion shall reign supreme. (8:40)
Fight against them until idolatry is no more and God's religion reigns supreme. (2:193)
The true believers fight for the cause of God, but the infidels fight for the devil. Fight then against the friends of Satan. (4:76)
We will put terror into the hearts of the unbelievers. (3:150)
I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads, strike off the very tips of their fingers. (8:12)
When the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you find them. (9:5)
Fight against such of those to whom the Scriptures were given as believe in neither God nor the Last Day, ... until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued. (9:29)
Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal rigorously with them. (9:73 and 66:9)
Believers, make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Deal firmly with them. (9:123)
When you meet the unbelievers in the battlefield, strike off their heads. (47:4)
These and other passages in the Koran, which are considered Allah's literal word, will be important to non-Muslims until the imams preach to their congregations that these passages are no longer valid. So far, it has not happened.
By Carl Goldberg
The unbelievers among the people of the book and the pagans shall burn forever in the fire of Hell. They are the vilest of all creatures. (98.6).
Surely the vilest of animals in Allah's sight are those who disbelieve. (8.55)
The unbelievers are your inveterate enemy. (4:101)
Mohammed is God's apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another. (48:29).
It is unlawful for a believer to kill another believer, accidents excepted. (4:92)
Believers, take neither the Jews nor the Christians for your friends. (5:51)
Make war on them [non-Muslims] until idolatry shall cease and God's religion shall reign supreme. (8:40)
Fight against them until idolatry is no more and God's religion reigns supreme. (2:193)
The true believers fight for the cause of God, but the infidels fight for the devil. Fight then against the friends of Satan. (4:76)
We will put terror into the hearts of the unbelievers. (3:150)
I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads, strike off the very tips of their fingers. (8:12)
When the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you find them. (9:5)
Fight against such of those to whom the Scriptures were given as believe in neither God nor the Last Day, ... until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued. (9:29)
Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal rigorously with them. (9:73 and 66:9)
Believers, make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Deal firmly with them. (9:123)
When you meet the unbelievers in the battlefield, strike off their heads. (47:4)
These and other passages in the Koran, which are considered Allah's literal word, will be important to non-Muslims until the imams preach to their congregations that these passages are no longer valid. So far, it has not happened.
By Carl Goldberg
Friday, September 14, 2007
Young Muslims begin dangerous fight for the right to abandon faith
....
“Sharia schools say that they will kill the ones who leave Islam. In the West people get threatened, thrown out of their family, beaten up,” Mr Jami said. “In Islam you are born Muslim. You do not even choose to be Muslim. We want that to change, so that people are free to choose who they want to be and what they want to believe in.”
Mr Jami, 22, who has abandoned his studies as his political career has taken off, denied that the choice of September 11 was deliberately provocative towards the Islamic Establishment. “We chose the date because we want to make a clear statement that we no longer tolerate the intolerence of Islam, the terrorist attacks,” he said.
“In 1965 the Church in Holland made a declaration that freedom of conscience is above hanging on to religion, so you can choose whether you are going to be a Christian or not. What we are seeking is the same thing for Islam.”
Mr Jami, who has compared the rise of radical Islam to the threat from Nazism in the 1930s, is receiving only lukewarm support from his party which traditionally relies upon Muslim votes. His outspoken attack on radical Islam has led to a prelaunch walk-out from fellow committee founder Loubna Berrada, who herself rejected Islam.
She said: “I don’t wish to confront Islam itself. I only want to spread the message that Muslims should be allowed to leave Islam behind without being threatened.”
....
By the Book
— 14 passages in the Koran refer to apostasy
— According to Baidhawi’s commentary, Sura 4: 88-89 reads: “Whosoever turns back from his belief, openly or secretly, take him and kill him wheresoever ye find him, like any other infidel. Separate yourself from him altogether. Do not accept intercession in his regard.”
— The hadith, tradition and legend about Muhammad and his followers used as a basis of Sharia, tells of some atheists who were brought to “’Ali and he burnt them. The news of this reached Ibn Abbas who said: ‘If I had been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah’s Apostate forbade it . . . I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah’s Apostate, ‘Whoever changed his [Islamic] religion, then kill him’.”
— According to hadith, a special reward in Paradise is reserved for the killer of apostates
Source: Times archives; Barnabas Fund
with thanks to Times Online
“Sharia schools say that they will kill the ones who leave Islam. In the West people get threatened, thrown out of their family, beaten up,” Mr Jami said. “In Islam you are born Muslim. You do not even choose to be Muslim. We want that to change, so that people are free to choose who they want to be and what they want to believe in.”
Mr Jami, 22, who has abandoned his studies as his political career has taken off, denied that the choice of September 11 was deliberately provocative towards the Islamic Establishment. “We chose the date because we want to make a clear statement that we no longer tolerate the intolerence of Islam, the terrorist attacks,” he said.
“In 1965 the Church in Holland made a declaration that freedom of conscience is above hanging on to religion, so you can choose whether you are going to be a Christian or not. What we are seeking is the same thing for Islam.”
Mr Jami, who has compared the rise of radical Islam to the threat from Nazism in the 1930s, is receiving only lukewarm support from his party which traditionally relies upon Muslim votes. His outspoken attack on radical Islam has led to a prelaunch walk-out from fellow committee founder Loubna Berrada, who herself rejected Islam.
She said: “I don’t wish to confront Islam itself. I only want to spread the message that Muslims should be allowed to leave Islam behind without being threatened.”
....
By the Book
— 14 passages in the Koran refer to apostasy
— According to Baidhawi’s commentary, Sura 4: 88-89 reads: “Whosoever turns back from his belief, openly or secretly, take him and kill him wheresoever ye find him, like any other infidel. Separate yourself from him altogether. Do not accept intercession in his regard.”
— The hadith, tradition and legend about Muhammad and his followers used as a basis of Sharia, tells of some atheists who were brought to “’Ali and he burnt them. The news of this reached Ibn Abbas who said: ‘If I had been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah’s Apostate forbade it . . . I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah’s Apostate, ‘Whoever changed his [Islamic] religion, then kill him’.”
— According to hadith, a special reward in Paradise is reserved for the killer of apostates
Source: Times archives; Barnabas Fund
with thanks to Times Online
Wednesday, July 25, 2007
Why are Muslims leaving Islam?
Ergun Caner, the dean of Liberty Baptist Seminary, and his brother openly discuss why they left Islam in this rarely seen video.
Sunday, July 22, 2007
Islam is dragging the Maldives backwards to 7th century Arabia
But in his summation the judge noted “the girl had reached puberty” and found “she was a willing partner,” because she had not screamed, struggled or told her sister-in-law or step mother about the event. He found the men guilty of consensual sex before marriage, and imposed the minimum sentence of eight months banishment.
From Minivan News
From Minivan News
Wednesday, July 11, 2007
Homosexuality in Islam
In addition to the 72+ whore al-eens (virgin sluts) that Mohamed promises (writing in his pseudonym of Allah) he also assures Muslims of the use of young boys for pleasure in his jannah paradise.Koran 52:24 "Round about them will serve, (devoted) to them, young male servants (handsome) as pearls well-guarded."
Koran 76:19 "And round about them shall go youths never altering in age; when you see them you will think them to be scattered pearls."
The mullah pictured here could not wait for Mohamed's jannah bordello and so he has sex with a "scattered pearl" right in the middle of the street. Mullahs, imams, sheikhs, muftis, Mohamed and other assorted Islamic perverts are above the law.
When Catholic priests molest children there is a law, there is a justice that holds them accountable. The imams ARE the law, justice and the government in Islamic states. So they can do their shameful acts in public. Who is going to stop them?
Click image to go to the Gay Islam website
al-Fatiha
Sunday, July 8, 2007
To the Adhaalathu Party and other jihadists
Leaders of the Adhaalathu Party and others who want to force Islam on the rest of us!
Let me keep this short and simple, in case you decide to invoke Mohamed’s Sunnah of illiteracy and pretend you do not understand what I am saying.
When Islam is established fully in Maldives under your party, what protection would there be for 6 to 9 year-old girls against pedophile freaks who want to emulate Mohamed’s Sunnah of having sex with 9-year-old girls? Can your best friend count on you not demanding that he gives his 9-year-old daughter for you to have pedophile sex? That was exactly what the dirty child-molester, your prophet Mohamed did to Aisha the daughter of his best friend Abu Bakuru. What if you want to invoke that Sunnah to help you claim those 72 Whore-al-Eens in Mohamed’s bordello called Jannah?
Let me keep this short and simple, in case you decide to invoke Mohamed’s Sunnah of illiteracy and pretend you do not understand what I am saying.
When Islam is established fully in Maldives under your party, what protection would there be for 6 to 9 year-old girls against pedophile freaks who want to emulate Mohamed’s Sunnah of having sex with 9-year-old girls? Can your best friend count on you not demanding that he gives his 9-year-old daughter for you to have pedophile sex? That was exactly what the dirty child-molester, your prophet Mohamed did to Aisha the daughter of his best friend Abu Bakuru. What if you want to invoke that Sunnah to help you claim those 72 Whore-al-Eens in Mohamed’s bordello called Jannah?
Thursday, July 5, 2007
The father of my 4 children arranged for a old, ugly man to have sex with me
After I left school I married my boyfriend. I was faithful to him. We had 4 children. During this time he divorce me 3 times because I complain about his affairs with other women. After he divorce me three times he arrange for ugly old man to have sex with me so he can marry me again. He need this because he want me to look after the children.
The price I pay not to be separate from the 4 children I love more than myself is to have sex with the old man. I will write you my painful experience later.
I will not believe this is the law of a god. This is the rules of ignorant people and satan. Muslims are bad people and I am suffering for being under muslim law.
The price I pay not to be separate from the 4 children I love more than myself is to have sex with the old man. I will write you my painful experience later.
I will not believe this is the law of a god. This is the rules of ignorant people and satan. Muslims are bad people and I am suffering for being under muslim law.
Tuesday, July 3, 2007
Islam's not for me
lyrics by "Bom bin YurShu"
Click to listen
They tried to tell me my religion was wrong.
They tried to tell me to follow Islam.
They said their "Prophet" was a righteous dude,
But I found out none of their words were true.
I read the Qur'an and I read the Hadith,
And the sickness of Mohammed was apparent to me.
He justified perversion in the name of Allah,
When he married a girl too young for a bra.
She was playing with dolls when the "Prophet" came.
Her childhood was stolen in Allah's name.
Aisha was nine when he took her to bed.
Don’t tell me that fool's not sick in the head.
I ain’'t gonna follow no child molester, sex offender, Prophet pretender.
I ain’'t gonna follow no child molester! Islam's not for me!
Islam's not for me!
The sickness of the Islamic mind,
Has caused some mullas to be blind.
To justify their "Prophet" they will justify sin,
So the sins of the "Prophet" are repeated again.
All over the world in Islamic states,
Nine year old girls suffer cruel fate,
Sold into marriage to twisted men,
And Aisha’s sad story is repeated again.
I ain’'t gonna follow no child molester, sex offender, Prophet pretender.
I ain’'t gonna follow no child molester! Islam's not for me!
Islam's not for me!
Do you care about women all over the world?
Do you care about those little girls?
Better stand up and fight for human rights,
Speak out against the laws of Islam!
I ain’'t gonna follow no child molester, sex offender, Prophet pretender.
I ain’'t gonna follow no child molester! Islam's not for me!
Islam's not for me!
Islam's not for me!
Many thanks to www.islamcomicbook.com/lyrics1.htm
Click to listen
They tried to tell me my religion was wrong.
They tried to tell me to follow Islam.
They said their "Prophet" was a righteous dude,
But I found out none of their words were true.
I read the Qur'an and I read the Hadith,
And the sickness of Mohammed was apparent to me.
He justified perversion in the name of Allah,
When he married a girl too young for a bra.
She was playing with dolls when the "Prophet" came.
Her childhood was stolen in Allah's name.
Aisha was nine when he took her to bed.
Don’t tell me that fool's not sick in the head.
I ain’'t gonna follow no child molester, sex offender, Prophet pretender.
I ain’'t gonna follow no child molester! Islam's not for me!
Islam's not for me!
The sickness of the Islamic mind,
Has caused some mullas to be blind.
To justify their "Prophet" they will justify sin,
So the sins of the "Prophet" are repeated again.
All over the world in Islamic states,
Nine year old girls suffer cruel fate,
Sold into marriage to twisted men,
And Aisha’s sad story is repeated again.
I ain’'t gonna follow no child molester, sex offender, Prophet pretender.
I ain’'t gonna follow no child molester! Islam's not for me!
Islam's not for me!
Do you care about women all over the world?
Do you care about those little girls?
Better stand up and fight for human rights,
Speak out against the laws of Islam!
I ain’'t gonna follow no child molester, sex offender, Prophet pretender.
I ain’'t gonna follow no child molester! Islam's not for me!
Islam's not for me!
Islam's not for me!
Many thanks to www.islamcomicbook.com/lyrics1.htm
Sunday, June 24, 2007
The diary of a Malidivian
The diary of a Malidivian, currently living in the United Kingdom, where the Religious Police no longer trouble him for the moment.In Memory of the lives of Maldivian Politicians, lost in double stand between religion and politics. when their self’s burnt down. The Religious Police is watching them and would not allow them to leave the building, nor allow the Firemen to enter.
24 June 2007
A Memo
From: Royal Press SecretaryTo: His MajestyDate: 1st February 2006Subject: CartoonsAs Your Majesty requested recently, in order to divert public attention from the regrettable demise of a small number of pilgrims in Makkah during the last Hajj, Saudi newspapers were instructed to revive the four-month-old story of cartoons about the Prophet (PBUH) in a Danish newspaper, and turn it into an attack on Denmark, together with a "spontaneous demand by the people" for a boycott of Danish goods. So far this has worked reasonably well, although major Danish exports are bacon and lager beer, which we do not import, except as "special consignments" for some members of your family. There has also been some unfortunate "collateral damage" in that "Nido" was wrongly identified as a Danish product when it is in fact Swiss; also the boycott has resulted in several thousand Third World expatriates being laid off in the Saudi plants of the Danish dairy company Arla. However we cannot be expected to take the troubles of the entire world upon our shoulders. What is becoming to a concern to me is the "Denmark fatigue" that is clearly emerging in our newspapers. It has been an enormous strain on them to produce up to four reports a day from a story where nothing is essentially happening. It is also apparent that "reader fatigue" is setting in, and that instead of yet another article on Denmark, they would much prefer to read in great detail all the minutiae of Your Majesty's travels around the world, the full transcripts of your after-dinner speeches, and other matters of great interest and importance .
I have therefore given some thought to "spicing up" the story, and have come to the conclusion that we ought to find some other country, ideally small, harmless and inoffensive and with exports that do not appeal to your family, to demonize in addition to Denmark. I have therefore been reviewing all published representations of the Prophet (PBUH) to establish what countries could be blamed for them. Sadly, there are many representations out there, perhaps more than we ever imagined.
This picture is of an early Renaissance fresco in Bologna's Church of San Petronio, created by Giovanni da Modena and depicting Mohammed being tortured in Hell. Whilst theologically incorrect (it is in fact the Pope who will be tortured in Hell), I would not recommend antagonizing the Italians at this time, simply because of the volume of Italian marble that is imported for use within our royal palaces and public buildings.
This is present-day imagery that can be bought easily in the souks of Iran, and confirms how doctrinally unsound these Shiite Muslims are. However I would recommend against targeting Iran at present, for the same reason that you in your royal wisdom have chosen not to criticize their building of nuclear weapons; we want to avoid being seen as "Pro-Israeli". This is a representation of the eviscerated Prophet (PBUH) in the Eighth Circle of Hell as described in the Italian Poet Dante's "Inferno", where he quotes the lines
No barrel, even though it's lost a hoop / or end-piece, ever gapes as one whom I / saw ripped right from his chin to where we fart: / his bowels hung between his legs, one saw / his vitals and the miserable sack / that makes of what we swallow excrement. While I was all intent on watching him, / he looked at me, and with his hands he spread his chest and said: "See how I split myself! / See now how maimed Mohammed is! And he / who walks and weeps before me is Alì, / whose face is opened wide from chin to forlock. The poet lived in what is now Italy, which I have touched on before. The artist, Gustave Doré, on the other hand, is French. However your Majesty would appreciate the difficulty of boycotting a country where you and several members of your family have summer residences. This is by an Islamic artist, from somewhere in Central Asia. However, no-one is going to be interested in some place called Uzz-Wuzzistan, or care if we stop importing Yak milk.This depiction of Mohammad at Madinah is of Arab origin. However, we can't boycott ourselves, can we? (If his Majesty will permit me this small jest!)In this picture, Mohammad is shown as trampling on the Cross and Ten Commandments, which, while admirable in itself, is still a Haram likeness. It is set in the Netherlands, which would qualify as a small and harmless country, only exporting flowers to my knowledge. However, thinking ahead, they are in Group C in this year's World Cup, and we are in Group H. If we meet later in the competition, having victimized them over a 300-year-old picture, then we would definitely get a very serious kicking with the rest of the world cheering them on, and a great loss of face for us. Discretion is the better part of valor in this instance.
In this image, the Prophet (PBUH) is depicted in an advertisement for bouillon cubes. It is German. However the Germans have a reputation for being very aggressive, and would definitely boot us from one end of the park to the other in the World Cup. Best left alone. The North Frieze on the Supreme Court building in Washington, DC features a bas-relief sculpture of Mohammed, in between other law-givers Justinian and Charlemagne. If His Majesty will permit me my little jest, we know a few guys in Afghanistan who have experience in removing statues from rock faces! (We may have to wait a few decades, though!).
Another image from the USA, this time the sacriligious "South Park" episode called "Super Best Friends". Whilst I do not propose boycotting the USA, His Majesty may wish to be reminded of some of their blasphemies, for such time as and when this decadent country falls, like an over-ripe plum, into our lap. The final image is the most promising.Published a mere 30 years ago, and in itself a very dashing depiction, it is nevertheless a Haram covering for an illustrated story. And the good news is that it was written by Hergé, a Belgian! Belgium is a small, harmless country that only exports, to my knowledge, chocolates and beer, but not Your Majesty's favorites. Also, they are not in the World Cup! I recommend them as the next country to threaten, once the Saudi public tires of Denmark, which will alas be very soon. Victory, as we both appreciate, is all a matter of choosing the right fight.
PS, the Germans have gone on the offensive. I did say they were very aggressive.
PPS I have now learnt that France Soir in France, La Stampa in Italy and El Periodico in Spain have also published these cartoons. Tomorrow no doubt their competitors will do the same thing. I fear that we are going to lose the initiative here, we can't boycott everyone, we could become a laughing stock. Guidance, please. Should I order the Saudi papers to follow standard procedures and ignore all this bad news?
Press Secretary
24 June 2007
A Memo
From: Royal Press SecretaryTo: His MajestyDate: 1st February 2006Subject: CartoonsAs Your Majesty requested recently, in order to divert public attention from the regrettable demise of a small number of pilgrims in Makkah during the last Hajj, Saudi newspapers were instructed to revive the four-month-old story of cartoons about the Prophet (PBUH) in a Danish newspaper, and turn it into an attack on Denmark, together with a "spontaneous demand by the people" for a boycott of Danish goods. So far this has worked reasonably well, although major Danish exports are bacon and lager beer, which we do not import, except as "special consignments" for some members of your family. There has also been some unfortunate "collateral damage" in that "Nido" was wrongly identified as a Danish product when it is in fact Swiss; also the boycott has resulted in several thousand Third World expatriates being laid off in the Saudi plants of the Danish dairy company Arla. However we cannot be expected to take the troubles of the entire world upon our shoulders. What is becoming to a concern to me is the "Denmark fatigue" that is clearly emerging in our newspapers. It has been an enormous strain on them to produce up to four reports a day from a story where nothing is essentially happening. It is also apparent that "reader fatigue" is setting in, and that instead of yet another article on Denmark, they would much prefer to read in great detail all the minutiae of Your Majesty's travels around the world, the full transcripts of your after-dinner speeches, and other matters of great interest and importance .
I have therefore given some thought to "spicing up" the story, and have come to the conclusion that we ought to find some other country, ideally small, harmless and inoffensive and with exports that do not appeal to your family, to demonize in addition to Denmark. I have therefore been reviewing all published representations of the Prophet (PBUH) to establish what countries could be blamed for them. Sadly, there are many representations out there, perhaps more than we ever imagined.
This picture is of an early Renaissance fresco in Bologna's Church of San Petronio, created by Giovanni da Modena and depicting Mohammed being tortured in Hell. Whilst theologically incorrect (it is in fact the Pope who will be tortured in Hell), I would not recommend antagonizing the Italians at this time, simply because of the volume of Italian marble that is imported for use within our royal palaces and public buildings.
This is present-day imagery that can be bought easily in the souks of Iran, and confirms how doctrinally unsound these Shiite Muslims are. However I would recommend against targeting Iran at present, for the same reason that you in your royal wisdom have chosen not to criticize their building of nuclear weapons; we want to avoid being seen as "Pro-Israeli". This is a representation of the eviscerated Prophet (PBUH) in the Eighth Circle of Hell as described in the Italian Poet Dante's "Inferno", where he quotes the lines
No barrel, even though it's lost a hoop / or end-piece, ever gapes as one whom I / saw ripped right from his chin to where we fart: / his bowels hung between his legs, one saw / his vitals and the miserable sack / that makes of what we swallow excrement. While I was all intent on watching him, / he looked at me, and with his hands he spread his chest and said: "See how I split myself! / See now how maimed Mohammed is! And he / who walks and weeps before me is Alì, / whose face is opened wide from chin to forlock. The poet lived in what is now Italy, which I have touched on before. The artist, Gustave Doré, on the other hand, is French. However your Majesty would appreciate the difficulty of boycotting a country where you and several members of your family have summer residences. This is by an Islamic artist, from somewhere in Central Asia. However, no-one is going to be interested in some place called Uzz-Wuzzistan, or care if we stop importing Yak milk.This depiction of Mohammad at Madinah is of Arab origin. However, we can't boycott ourselves, can we? (If his Majesty will permit me this small jest!)In this picture, Mohammad is shown as trampling on the Cross and Ten Commandments, which, while admirable in itself, is still a Haram likeness. It is set in the Netherlands, which would qualify as a small and harmless country, only exporting flowers to my knowledge. However, thinking ahead, they are in Group C in this year's World Cup, and we are in Group H. If we meet later in the competition, having victimized them over a 300-year-old picture, then we would definitely get a very serious kicking with the rest of the world cheering them on, and a great loss of face for us. Discretion is the better part of valor in this instance.
In this image, the Prophet (PBUH) is depicted in an advertisement for bouillon cubes. It is German. However the Germans have a reputation for being very aggressive, and would definitely boot us from one end of the park to the other in the World Cup. Best left alone. The North Frieze on the Supreme Court building in Washington, DC features a bas-relief sculpture of Mohammed, in between other law-givers Justinian and Charlemagne. If His Majesty will permit me my little jest, we know a few guys in Afghanistan who have experience in removing statues from rock faces! (We may have to wait a few decades, though!).
Another image from the USA, this time the sacriligious "South Park" episode called "Super Best Friends". Whilst I do not propose boycotting the USA, His Majesty may wish to be reminded of some of their blasphemies, for such time as and when this decadent country falls, like an over-ripe plum, into our lap. The final image is the most promising.Published a mere 30 years ago, and in itself a very dashing depiction, it is nevertheless a Haram covering for an illustrated story. And the good news is that it was written by Hergé, a Belgian! Belgium is a small, harmless country that only exports, to my knowledge, chocolates and beer, but not Your Majesty's favorites. Also, they are not in the World Cup! I recommend them as the next country to threaten, once the Saudi public tires of Denmark, which will alas be very soon. Victory, as we both appreciate, is all a matter of choosing the right fight.
PS, the Germans have gone on the offensive. I did say they were very aggressive.
PPS I have now learnt that France Soir in France, La Stampa in Italy and El Periodico in Spain have also published these cartoons. Tomorrow no doubt their competitors will do the same thing. I fear that we are going to lose the initiative here, we can't boycott everyone, we could become a laughing stock. Guidance, please. Should I order the Saudi papers to follow standard procedures and ignore all this bad news?
Press Secretary
Friday, June 15, 2007
Muslims are required to be terrorists, says Adhaalath
The truth is out at last! The Hizbul Adhaalath (Maldivian Islamic political party) web site has openly published a comment that says “In reality, even if someone calls us [Muslims] terrorists we would be proud. The fact is that terrorism is a quality that we [Muslims] are required to have"
Wednesday, June 13, 2007
Reading with an open mind instead of reciting
We have received a few emails. Most of it not very nice. The following email is from a lady with an open mind. The writer understandably wishes to remain anonymous :-
' I was taught to recite the Quran in Arabic as a child. I did not understand anything. A few years ago I tried to read a Quran translation in English. I understood nothing because it was very complicated. Then I tried learning about Islam on the internet. There is a lot of things in easier ways to understand. I started reading with an open mind instead of reciting like a fool. After reading the stories about Mohammed and Islam , I understand Islam is about killing and women. Mohammed killed many people. He ask us to kill, cutting hands etc. Then there are many rules about women. Very bad rules. I don't believe in Islam anymore. Mohammed is not a prophet. I cannot believe in something violent and cruel. I know why there is fighting and trouble where there are muslim every where. I have left Islam."
' I was taught to recite the Quran in Arabic as a child. I did not understand anything. A few years ago I tried to read a Quran translation in English. I understood nothing because it was very complicated. Then I tried learning about Islam on the internet. There is a lot of things in easier ways to understand. I started reading with an open mind instead of reciting like a fool. After reading the stories about Mohammed and Islam , I understand Islam is about killing and women. Mohammed killed many people. He ask us to kill, cutting hands etc. Then there are many rules about women. Very bad rules. I don't believe in Islam anymore. Mohammed is not a prophet. I cannot believe in something violent and cruel. I know why there is fighting and trouble where there are muslim every where. I have left Islam."
Friday, June 8, 2007
Community Censorship Plagues the House of Islam
Even worse than the official censorship is censorship imposed by the community, which then becomes self-censorship. Friends, colleagues and even ordinary acquaintances all impose strict censorship rules on me under the guise of being concerned about my personal safety or honor. They demand that I tone down my strong views about sensitive issues.
Freedom of the press in the Muslim world cannot be separated from freedom of expression in general. Journalists, due to their conspicuous public role, risk their lives everyday. They have been targeted and killed in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Palestine, Somalia, Sudan and other countries. The Muslim world is not a friendly place for freedom of speech at all.
Journalists, creative writers and artists all share the same fate. The writer in a Muslim society is in shackles. Every time I put pen to paper it is a struggle against the tyranny of community-imposed self-censorship. Nowhere is Rousseau's statement that "Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains," truer than in the House of Islam.
Everything is a taboo. Whenever a Muslim writer takes up a pen he starts tiptoeing in a minefield. You have to follow the flag signs of religious, cultural and social taboos. You should tread carefully avoid shame, social estrangement or even death.
The beheading of the Sudanese journalist Mohamed Taha Mohamed Ahmed in early September was the latest example of community punishment of a journalist/writer.
Writers have to endure internet blockages and black ink splashed on their art magazines and school textbooks. One of the most bizarre censorship actions I have ever seen was the blotting out of the sexual organs of a historical picture of donkey standing in an old Arabian market.
In the House of Islam, you cannot have a principle other than that of the community. Every thing you do is referred to Islam. The mantra is "that's stupid BUT...But we cannot do this because we are Muslims." One hears this expression ad nauseam. In the Islamic world you cease to be a human being. You become only a Muslim, whatever that entails.
You are not allowed to be a person with vices and virtues, you cannot follow your own reasoning, and you cannot be unpopular or defend an unpopular idea. You cannot go out of the circle. To express yourself freely means to risk death. And death indeed if you change your faith. Invention itself is considered as an act of blasphemy.
.......
........
To survive in such unfriendly atmosphere like this, journalists in the Muslim world have become like parrots that only echo the official line. Torn between the call of professionalism and that of censorship, they have to always adhere to the call of the latter. If it takes a village to raise a child in Africa, it takes a community to kill a writer, artist and a journalist in the Muslim world.
By Bashir Goth. He is a veteran journalist, freelance writer, the first Somali blogger and editor of a leading news website.
Further reading:
Intellectual Censorship in Islam: A Matter of Life and Death
Censorship, Violence, Hate, And Persecution - In The Name of Islam
Islamic Censorship Has Struck Youtube!
Censorship and Persecution in the Name of Islam
Govt Bans 37 Publications On Islam
Freedom of the press in the Muslim world cannot be separated from freedom of expression in general. Journalists, due to their conspicuous public role, risk their lives everyday. They have been targeted and killed in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Palestine, Somalia, Sudan and other countries. The Muslim world is not a friendly place for freedom of speech at all.
Journalists, creative writers and artists all share the same fate. The writer in a Muslim society is in shackles. Every time I put pen to paper it is a struggle against the tyranny of community-imposed self-censorship. Nowhere is Rousseau's statement that "Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains," truer than in the House of Islam.
Everything is a taboo. Whenever a Muslim writer takes up a pen he starts tiptoeing in a minefield. You have to follow the flag signs of religious, cultural and social taboos. You should tread carefully avoid shame, social estrangement or even death.
The beheading of the Sudanese journalist Mohamed Taha Mohamed Ahmed in early September was the latest example of community punishment of a journalist/writer.
Writers have to endure internet blockages and black ink splashed on their art magazines and school textbooks. One of the most bizarre censorship actions I have ever seen was the blotting out of the sexual organs of a historical picture of donkey standing in an old Arabian market.
In the House of Islam, you cannot have a principle other than that of the community. Every thing you do is referred to Islam. The mantra is "that's stupid BUT...But we cannot do this because we are Muslims." One hears this expression ad nauseam. In the Islamic world you cease to be a human being. You become only a Muslim, whatever that entails.
You are not allowed to be a person with vices and virtues, you cannot follow your own reasoning, and you cannot be unpopular or defend an unpopular idea. You cannot go out of the circle. To express yourself freely means to risk death. And death indeed if you change your faith. Invention itself is considered as an act of blasphemy.
.......
........
To survive in such unfriendly atmosphere like this, journalists in the Muslim world have become like parrots that only echo the official line. Torn between the call of professionalism and that of censorship, they have to always adhere to the call of the latter. If it takes a village to raise a child in Africa, it takes a community to kill a writer, artist and a journalist in the Muslim world.
By Bashir Goth. He is a veteran journalist, freelance writer, the first Somali blogger and editor of a leading news website.
Further reading:
Intellectual Censorship in Islam: A Matter of Life and Death
Censorship, Violence, Hate, And Persecution - In The Name of Islam
Islamic Censorship Has Struck Youtube!
Censorship and Persecution in the Name of Islam
Govt Bans 37 Publications On Islam
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
Economics of Religious Freedom
There are many reasons because Maldivians are intolerant towards their fellow countrymen of other faiths. One of them is because there is a large Islam educated clergy who do not want to lose a part of their market to other religions. They have Koran classes, they have the jobs in the mosques...etc. If other religions were allowed they will lose the monopoly they have on religious affairs. That is one reason why they teach intolerance towards other faiths.
Tuesday, May 29, 2007
Islamic Politics
Qur’an and history shows that Muhammad taught and led a totalitarian movement enforced by the sword similar to those led by other fascists and dictators. The government of Maldives compares very well to any totalitarian system of government. Ahaalath Party is a Islamist fundamentalist and Islamic extreme party which shares with the totalitarian regime of the dictator Maumoon Abdul Gayoom's government to centralization of political power and establish Islamic domination in The Maldives. Maumoon Abdul Gayoom is using Islam as a political movement and he is using Islam as a sword to crush the reform process and the democratization of Maldives. With the help from Adhaalath Party.
The dictator Maumoon Abdu Gayoom’s mandate isn't about building a few mosques, schools, or other centers to meet the needs of Maldivians. But to change the existing laws into Islamic laws and to make the supreme council of Islam in The Maldives the hub of the political spectrum and dominate Maldives by Mullahs and Islamic extremists. The way for Maumoon Abdul Gayoom and the Adhallath Party to do this is to masquerading Adahhath Party as a religious and a political party ( Party of Allah) But the religious disguise is becoming paper thin, as non-Muslims of Maldives and the amount of Maldivian leaving Islam is increasing day by day. We will publish the total no of Non Muslim Maldivian and their respective religions on this site shortly. Beware the crusaders are on the move and it has begun.And we shall prevail.
The dictator Maumoon Abdu Gayoom’s mandate isn't about building a few mosques, schools, or other centers to meet the needs of Maldivians. But to change the existing laws into Islamic laws and to make the supreme council of Islam in The Maldives the hub of the political spectrum and dominate Maldives by Mullahs and Islamic extremists. The way for Maumoon Abdul Gayoom and the Adhallath Party to do this is to masquerading Adahhath Party as a religious and a political party ( Party of Allah) But the religious disguise is becoming paper thin, as non-Muslims of Maldives and the amount of Maldivian leaving Islam is increasing day by day. We will publish the total no of Non Muslim Maldivian and their respective religions on this site shortly. Beware the crusaders are on the move and it has begun.And we shall prevail.
Thursday, May 17, 2007
A nation is made of people. For the common good of all people it is the responsibility of every citizen to grant his fellow citizens human rights. Not in part and pieces. But in totality.
Those who try to force beliefs that go against these rights are unfeeling and insensitive towards his fellow citizens. They do not have a right to behave in this manner.
Maldivis should not continue to enforce a particular religion on all its citizens. There must be room for people of all faiths.
Those who try to force beliefs that go against these rights are unfeeling and insensitive towards his fellow citizens. They do not have a right to behave in this manner.
Maldivis should not continue to enforce a particular religion on all its citizens. There must be room for people of all faiths.
People own a nation. The idea that a particular religion owns a nation is antiquated, unreasonable and heartless.
No religion should claim or own our nation.
Monday, May 14, 2007
My friend is moving out...
My friend has rented out the small place he has and is packing his bag to take his family out of the country. He is moving to Sri Lanka so that his children will have better education and a life free from the religious intolerance of Maldivian society.
There is a brain drain happening. There are people who do not wish an ideology or religion to be imposed on them. Throwing them out or expecting htem to move is not right. Room and space must be created that they remain in Maldives and contribute to the nation. After all it is their nation too.
Maldivians must be granted their rights as human beings if we are to join the rest of humanity. Maldives will not progress unless the state and religion are separated.
There is a brain drain happening. There are people who do not wish an ideology or religion to be imposed on them. Throwing them out or expecting htem to move is not right. Room and space must be created that they remain in Maldives and contribute to the nation. After all it is their nation too.
Maldivians must be granted their rights as human beings if we are to join the rest of humanity. Maldives will not progress unless the state and religion are separated.
More responses...
އެއްވެސް އިރެއްގައި ޤާއިމްކުރެވިފައި އޮންނަ ސަރުކާރެއް ބާރުގެ ބޭނުންކޮށްގެން ވައްޓާލުމަކީ އެއީ ކުރިމަގުގެ ޖީލުތަކަށް ދެއްކޭ ވަރަށް ނުބައި ނަމޫނާއެކެވެ. އައު ޕާޓީއަކުން ވެރިކަމާ ހަމަ ޙަވާލުވާއިރަށް އެވީ އެވެރިކަން ވައްޓަން އިދިކޮޅު ޕާޓީތަކުން ނުކުންނާށެވެ. އެހެންވެއްޖިއްޔާ ވެރިކަން ވެއްޓުން ނޫންކަމެއް ދިވެހިންނަކަށް ނޯންނާނެތާއެވެ. ހުޅަނގުގެ ޑިމޮކްރެސީއިން ލިބޭ ނަމޫނާއަކީ މިއީތޯއެވެ؟ ދިވެހިން ބޭނުންވެގެން އުޅޭ އިޞްލާޙީ ބަދަލަކީ މިއީތޯއެވެ؟
The western democratic model is based on the ballot box. This is the peaceful method devised that people may decide things without resorting to arms and violence.
ބޭރު ޤައުމުތަކަށް ކިޔަވަންދާ ބައެއް ދިވެހިންގެ ޙާލާމެދުވެސް ސަހަރޯވެރި ވާވަރުވެއެވެ. މިބައިމީހުންނަށް ވާގޮތަކީ މިމީހުންގެ ވިސްނުމުގެ ފެންވަރުދަށްކަމުން މިމީހުން ދާ ކޮންމެ ޤައުމެއްގެ ސަގާފަތަށް ރޭރުވެވެނީއެވެ. އާގޮތެއް ފެންނައިރަށް އެގޮތް ރީތިވެގެން އެނޫން ގޮތެއް ނެތްކަމަށް ވަނީއެވެ
What this Mullah is preaching is what he learnt in a madrassa in a foreign country.
ދީނީ ޢިލްމުވެރިންގެ މަޖިލީހެއް އޮތުމުގެ ބޭނުންތަކުގެ ތެރޭގައި ރާއްޖޭގައި އުފެދިގެން މިއުޅޭ ދީނީ ޚިލާފުތައް ނައްތައި، ދިވެހި ރައްޔިތުންގެ ދީނީ އެއްބައިވަންތަކަން ޙިމާޔަތްކޮށް، ދީން ދެމެހެއްޓުން ހިމެނެއެވެ. ރާއްޖޭގައި އެހެން ދީނެއް ޤާއިމުވިޔަނުދިނުން ހިމެނެއެވެ. ދީނުގެ އަޞްލުތަކުން ބޭރުގައި ތިބެގެން ދީނުގެ ކަންކަމުގައި ފަތުވާދީ ހަދާ މީހުން ރާއްޖޭގައި އަބަދުވެސް އުޅެއެވެ. އަދި މިކަން ކުރާ މީހުންނަކީ އެކި ސިފައިގައި ތިބޭ ބައެކެވެ. މިފަދަ ކަންކަމަކީ ދީނީ ފިތުނަ އުފެއްދުމެވެ. މިއީ ހުއްޓުވެންޖެހޭނެ ކަމެކެވެ.
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This man and his organization has no right to enforce their religion on me.
The western democratic model is based on the ballot box. This is the peaceful method devised that people may decide things without resorting to arms and violence.
ބޭރު ޤައުމުތަކަށް ކިޔަވަންދާ ބައެއް ދިވެހިންގެ ޙާލާމެދުވެސް ސަހަރޯވެރި ވާވަރުވެއެވެ. މިބައިމީހުންނަށް ވާގޮތަކީ މިމީހުންގެ ވިސްނުމުގެ ފެންވަރުދަށްކަމުން މިމީހުން ދާ ކޮންމެ ޤައުމެއްގެ ސަގާފަތަށް ރޭރުވެވެނީއެވެ. އާގޮތެއް ފެންނައިރަށް އެގޮތް ރީތިވެގެން އެނޫން ގޮތެއް ނެތްކަމަށް ވަނީއެވެ
What this Mullah is preaching is what he learnt in a madrassa in a foreign country.
ދީނީ ޢިލްމުވެރިންގެ މަޖިލީހެއް އޮތުމުގެ ބޭނުންތަކުގެ ތެރޭގައި ރާއްޖޭގައި އުފެދިގެން މިއުޅޭ ދީނީ ޚިލާފުތައް ނައްތައި، ދިވެހި ރައްޔިތުންގެ ދީނީ އެއްބައިވަންތަކަން ޙިމާޔަތްކޮށް، ދީން ދެމެހެއްޓުން ހިމެނެއެވެ. ރާއްޖޭގައި އެހެން ދީނެއް ޤާއިމުވިޔަނުދިނުން ހިމެނެއެވެ. ދީނުގެ އަޞްލުތަކުން ބޭރުގައި ތިބެގެން ދީނުގެ ކަންކަމުގައި ފަތުވާދީ ހަދާ މީހުން ރާއްޖޭގައި އަބަދުވެސް އުޅެއެވެ. އަދި މިކަން ކުރާ މީހުންނަކީ އެކި ސިފައިގައި ތިބޭ ބައެކެވެ. މިފަދަ ކަންކަމަކީ ދީނީ ފިތުނަ އުފެއްދުމެވެ. މިއީ ހުއްޓުވެންޖެހޭނެ ކަމެކެވެ.
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This man and his organization has no right to enforce their religion on me.
Sunday, May 13, 2007
Response to Adhaalathu Party continued..
More nonsense in the Adhaalat Party website on this article.
މުސްލިމުން ވަނީ 1100 އަހަރަށްވުރެ ދިގު މުއްދަތެއްގައި މުޅި ދުނިޔޭގެ ވެރިކަން ކޮށްފައެވެ.
There is no known record of Muslims ever having ruled Australia.
Or for that matter North and South America. Or China, Korea, Vietnam, Japan, Norway, Finland, Iceland or south Africa. And a lot more places.
Saturday, May 12, 2007
Adhaalath Mullahs and Islamic Virgins
The final achievement in life is to be nearest to Allah in heaven ( 7th heaven )says Adhaalath Mullahs.
There are, various levels or degrees of that. If a believer of Islam produces the highest deed in the faith, he is awarded that level of heaven, the nearest to the prophet Muhamed or the nearest to Allah.
If a believer of Islam blows himself up with a bomb and in the process kills many innocent people, provided he does it to defend his belief, that highest level of heaven is guaranteed to him according to Adhaalath Mullahs. This way of killing people no victim is innocent in the process of killing to defend Islamic loyalty. Those killed and wounded in a terrorist attack are not innocent in the eyes of the Adhaalath’s Allah. The objective of their god Allah is to subject all humanity to one belief. Adhaalath, stop preaching us and our children to defend Islamic loyalty and your belief. Adhaalath Party believes the guilty, and infidels, are all those who do not agree that Allah has everything under control. Oh Adhaalath !
Well, I do not understand this violent religion. From my point of view, that the faithful members of Adhaalath Party arrives in the highest heaven and is awarded the everlasting blessings of rivers of honey and everything he wishes, that includes alcohol, homosexuality , lesbians and orgies, not the least of which is a harem of pure virgins to charm himself in eternal sexual pleasure. Having sex in heaven? Oh Adhaalath!
Adhaalath fanatics please excuse my ignorance but you are the Mullahs who preach everything under the sky even if it comes to “ space technology ” as if you are the godly sprits who can wed 4 to 11 women and satisfy them at the same time. I need some explanation but I would like to know where all those virgins come from, since a virgin is only virgin one time, what happens to them after they are used? Millions of them need to be in supply throughout eternity. They must be coming from the mansions of gold where the prophet Muhamed lives since the eighth century!
Now, Mullahs imagine this , a heaven where there are more women than men! In the course of eternity, besides lots of honey and wine, which will eventually taste awful, imagine a level of heaven where virgins come in, are used, and then discarded to give room for the next! Or, is it that those virgins, upon being used, are somehow disposed of and dumped somewhere? Having lots of sex in between drinks cleanliness will be top priority . Changing blood-spattered sheets and all the rest. Who does the laundering ? Oh Adhaalath!
It seems that those virgins will either continue to be used after losing their virginity, but with no brains like you lot! This way, those innocent creatures can endure their sexual slavery for eternity. With no brain to think! This is what you Mullahs are preaching . Don’t think. Brain is only to read Quran and obey Allah, Don’t think! Says Adhaalath Mullahs!
Your characterization of the Islamic heaven is the limit in fantasy! Perhaps heaven is just that, after all: ADHAALATH MULLAHS IGNORANCE!
There are, various levels or degrees of that. If a believer of Islam produces the highest deed in the faith, he is awarded that level of heaven, the nearest to the prophet Muhamed or the nearest to Allah.
If a believer of Islam blows himself up with a bomb and in the process kills many innocent people, provided he does it to defend his belief, that highest level of heaven is guaranteed to him according to Adhaalath Mullahs. This way of killing people no victim is innocent in the process of killing to defend Islamic loyalty. Those killed and wounded in a terrorist attack are not innocent in the eyes of the Adhaalath’s Allah. The objective of their god Allah is to subject all humanity to one belief. Adhaalath, stop preaching us and our children to defend Islamic loyalty and your belief. Adhaalath Party believes the guilty, and infidels, are all those who do not agree that Allah has everything under control. Oh Adhaalath !
Well, I do not understand this violent religion. From my point of view, that the faithful members of Adhaalath Party arrives in the highest heaven and is awarded the everlasting blessings of rivers of honey and everything he wishes, that includes alcohol, homosexuality , lesbians and orgies, not the least of which is a harem of pure virgins to charm himself in eternal sexual pleasure. Having sex in heaven? Oh Adhaalath!
Adhaalath fanatics please excuse my ignorance but you are the Mullahs who preach everything under the sky even if it comes to “ space technology ” as if you are the godly sprits who can wed 4 to 11 women and satisfy them at the same time. I need some explanation but I would like to know where all those virgins come from, since a virgin is only virgin one time, what happens to them after they are used? Millions of them need to be in supply throughout eternity. They must be coming from the mansions of gold where the prophet Muhamed lives since the eighth century!
Now, Mullahs imagine this , a heaven where there are more women than men! In the course of eternity, besides lots of honey and wine, which will eventually taste awful, imagine a level of heaven where virgins come in, are used, and then discarded to give room for the next! Or, is it that those virgins, upon being used, are somehow disposed of and dumped somewhere? Having lots of sex in between drinks cleanliness will be top priority . Changing blood-spattered sheets and all the rest. Who does the laundering ? Oh Adhaalath!
It seems that those virgins will either continue to be used after losing their virginity, but with no brains like you lot! This way, those innocent creatures can endure their sexual slavery for eternity. With no brain to think! This is what you Mullahs are preaching . Don’t think. Brain is only to read Quran and obey Allah, Don’t think! Says Adhaalath Mullahs!
Your characterization of the Islamic heaven is the limit in fantasy! Perhaps heaven is just that, after all: ADHAALATH MULLAHS IGNORANCE!
Mullahs destroying Islam
This is what I am saying since last six year and I am glad to find out that there is someone who have the same understanding. I like this guy.
SENIOR VICE-PRESIDENT of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) Dr Kalbe Sadiq today blasted the ‘Mullahs’ for destroying Islam. He said their ill-conceived fatwas (edict) had not only painted Islam in black hues but had also stopped its progress. Dr Sadiq assailed both Shia and Sunni ulema (clerics) for straying away from Quranic path.
Dr Sadiq said Islam laid stress on ‘pen culture’ but Muslims had resorted to ‘gun culture’. Delivering lecture on ‘Islam versus Muslims’ on Sunday, Dr Sadiq said these Mullahs had tarnished the image of Islam in the past and the process was still continuing. He said they had issued ridiculous fatwas, which hampered the progress of the religion.
He said both Sunni and Shia clerics were responsible for present deplorable situation of Muslims. He squarely blamed the ulema for lack of unity in Muslims. Dr Sadiq said these clerics had been fighting among themselves but asking the community to unite. “It is absurd situation”, he said.
Pointing out that Islam was not responsible for the conduct of Muslims, Dr Sadiq said the community had strayed away from intellectual approach and justice. He said Islam did not allow unjust approach against any community.
Dr Sadiq reiterated that birth control was not anti-Islamic, as the religion had laid stress producing good generation and not on degeneration. Dr Sadiq said even though Islam did not permit abortion, it however had not asked the believers to produce child without having resources for his upkeep.
He also attacked Saudi Arabia King Abdullah for his corrupt way of life. He charged chief Mufti of mosque in Medina for resorting to all anti-Islamic activities. Dr Sadiq said history had enough examples that both Shia and Sunni monarch led anti-Islamic life.
He said there had been ulema who even issued fatwas against use of rifles in army or construction of steamship in Turkey. He said Shia ulema had been living lavish life, which was against the tenets of Islam.
Referring to Shia clerics of Lucknow, Dr Sadiq said their participation in luxurious marriages was against Islam. “It is religious crime on their part”, he pontificated and invited the ulema community to debate with him on issues raised by him.
Source: Hindustan Times.
SENIOR VICE-PRESIDENT of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) Dr Kalbe Sadiq today blasted the ‘Mullahs’ for destroying Islam. He said their ill-conceived fatwas (edict) had not only painted Islam in black hues but had also stopped its progress. Dr Sadiq assailed both Shia and Sunni ulema (clerics) for straying away from Quranic path.
Dr Sadiq said Islam laid stress on ‘pen culture’ but Muslims had resorted to ‘gun culture’. Delivering lecture on ‘Islam versus Muslims’ on Sunday, Dr Sadiq said these Mullahs had tarnished the image of Islam in the past and the process was still continuing. He said they had issued ridiculous fatwas, which hampered the progress of the religion.
He said both Sunni and Shia clerics were responsible for present deplorable situation of Muslims. He squarely blamed the ulema for lack of unity in Muslims. Dr Sadiq said these clerics had been fighting among themselves but asking the community to unite. “It is absurd situation”, he said.
Pointing out that Islam was not responsible for the conduct of Muslims, Dr Sadiq said the community had strayed away from intellectual approach and justice. He said Islam did not allow unjust approach against any community.
Dr Sadiq reiterated that birth control was not anti-Islamic, as the religion had laid stress producing good generation and not on degeneration. Dr Sadiq said even though Islam did not permit abortion, it however had not asked the believers to produce child without having resources for his upkeep.
He also attacked Saudi Arabia King Abdullah for his corrupt way of life. He charged chief Mufti of mosque in Medina for resorting to all anti-Islamic activities. Dr Sadiq said history had enough examples that both Shia and Sunni monarch led anti-Islamic life.
He said there had been ulema who even issued fatwas against use of rifles in army or construction of steamship in Turkey. He said Shia ulema had been living lavish life, which was against the tenets of Islam.
Referring to Shia clerics of Lucknow, Dr Sadiq said their participation in luxurious marriages was against Islam. “It is religious crime on their part”, he pontificated and invited the ulema community to debate with him on issues raised by him.
Source: Hindustan Times.
Adaalath and hypocrites
What adhaath says always contradicts real meaning of what they want to say and so is Islam. http://www.minivannews.com/news/news.php?id=3232
That’s why Islam and Adaalath are hypocrites http://www.adhaalathu.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=46&Itemid=53&show=1
After all how can a Mullah cheat another Mullah.
That’s why Islam and Adaalath are hypocrites http://www.adhaalathu.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=46&Itemid=53&show=1
After all how can a Mullah cheat another Mullah.
Mullahs
I don’t think community based conciliation existed in the Maldives. The state and the religion has the authority, in particular when it comes to punishment. As Islam is a religion of punishments, the state been the God and the God been the state. An atoll chief and or the community will not have the authority of the supreme mini Gods to judge and punish people. Many local customs have been destroyed by the Mullahs as is the case happening now .
In a few years, Blue Jeans and T shirts will be history in Maldives. Blue jeans and T shirts brings death and evil sprit to our nation and destroy it says the Mullahs. Keep the Mullahs under control as they will not hesitate to burn those before your grand children sees it.
In a few years, Blue Jeans and T shirts will be history in Maldives. Blue jeans and T shirts brings death and evil sprit to our nation and destroy it says the Mullahs. Keep the Mullahs under control as they will not hesitate to burn those before your grand children sees it.
A small response
This article on the Adhaalathu Party website is fascist and unacceptable.
އަޅުގަނޑުމެންނަކީ މުސްލިމުންކަމުގައިވީހިނދު
Are they talking about their party members or Maldivians? There are Maldivians of other faiths and beliefs. It is just there is no recognition that they exist.
އީރާނުގައި ޤާއިމްކުރެވިފައިވާ ވެރިކަމުގެ ނިޒާމަކީ ޑިމޮކްރެސީގެ އުޞޫލުތަކާ އެއްގޮތަށް ހަމަޖެހިފައިވާ ނިޒާމެކެވެ
The political system in Iran is not a democracy. It is a "theocracy".
ނަމަވެސް ހުޅަނގުގެ ޙަޟާރަތުގެ ޢުމުރަކީ އެންމެ 200 އަހަރެވެ.
The roots of western civilization go back to ancient Greece.
އަޅުގަނޑުމެންނަކީ މުސްލިމުންކަމުގައިވީހިނދު
Are they talking about their party members or Maldivians? There are Maldivians of other faiths and beliefs. It is just there is no recognition that they exist.
އީރާނުގައި ޤާއިމްކުރެވިފައިވާ ވެރިކަމުގެ ނިޒާމަކީ ޑިމޮކްރެސީގެ އުޞޫލުތަކާ އެއްގޮތަށް ހަމަޖެހިފައިވާ ނިޒާމެކެވެ
The political system in Iran is not a democracy. It is a "theocracy".
ނަމަވެސް ހުޅަނގުގެ ޙަޟާރަތުގެ ޢުމުރަކީ އެންމެ 200 އަހަރެވެ.
The roots of western civilization go back to ancient Greece.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
